![]() ![]() ![]() And it is certainly the case that, with or without the signs that represent them as inert negativities, holes themselves are never simply absences of positive things. Zero was always something very different from the sign which has emerged from the West's inability to deal with anything which, like zero, is neither something in particular nor nothing at all. Zero is something, though not some quality, which is what usually we mean by 'thing'. If zero is supposed to signify a hole, a space, or a missing piece, and one is the sign of positivity, digital machines turn these binaries around. Zero may mean nothing to the Western world, but this has nothing to do with the way it works. This part that many times is called zero or nothing. If we might say that reality is the state of relations, the invisible is a huge part of it. Would it be one reality or shall I say realities?. What would be its intensity, its image, its taste?. "What would be our reality if we could see all the things we cannot see?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |